Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 3 , Pages 185-193 , September 2009

Complications of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

References 

  1. Yang S, Wu X, Hu Y, et al. Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single- and multiple-level. Spine. 2008;33:E371–E377
  2. Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Fras CI, et al. The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J. 2008;8:711–716
  3. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine. 1993;18:2167–2173
  4. DePalma AF, Rothman RH, Lewinnek GE, et al. Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972;134:755–758
  5. Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs (A review of one hundred forty-six patients). Spine. 1984;9:667–671
  6. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(suppl 1):17–21
  7. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:519–528
  8. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17:79–85
  9. Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease (A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years). Spine. 1998;23:2047–2051
  10. Le H, Thongtrangan I, Kim DH. Historical review of cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;17:E1
  11. Wippermann BW, Schratt HE, Steeg S, et al. Complications of spongiosa harvesting of the ilial crest (A retrospective analysis of 1191 cases). Chirurg. 1997;68:1286–1291
  12. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Mayer M. Spine arthroplasty: a historical review. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl 2):S65–S84
  13. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Lim MR, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36:263–269
  14. Fernstrom U. Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1966;357:154–159
  15. Cummins BH, Robertson JT, Gill SS. Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:943–948
  16. Porchet F, Metcalf NH. Clinical outcomes with the prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;17:E6
  17. Bartels RH, Donk RD, Pavlov P, et al. Comparison of biomechanical properties of cervical artificial disc prosthesis: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008;110:963–967
  18. Wigfield CC, Gill SS, Nelson RJ, et al. The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study. Spine. 2002;27:2446–2452
  19. Traynelis VC. The prestige cervical disc replacement. Spine J. 2004;4(suppl 6):310S–314S
  20. Riew KD, Buchowski JM, Sasso R, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2354–2364
  21. Robertson JT, Metcalf NH. Long-term outcome after implantation of the prestige I disc in an end-stage indication: 4-year results from a pilot study. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;17:E10
  22. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, et al. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine. 2003;28:2673–2678
  23. Sasso RC, Best NM. Cervical kinematics after fusion and Bryan disc arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:19–22
  24. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine. 2008;33:1305–1312
  25. Yi S, Shin HC, Kim KN, et al. Modified techniques to prevent sagittal imbalance after cervical arthroplasty. Spine. 2007;32:1986–1991
  26. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, et al. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine. 2007;32:2933–2940discussion 2941-2932
  27. Sekhon LH. Reversal of anterior cervical fusion with a cervical arthroplasty prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(suppl 18):S125–S128
  28. Bryan VE. Cervical motion segment replacement. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl 2):S92–S97
  29. Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:759–763discussion 759-763
  30. Yoondo H. Clinical and radiographical results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148:943–950
  31. Goffin J. Complications of cervical disc arthroplasty. Semin Spine Surg. 2006;18:87–98
  32. Duggal N, Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, et al. Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;17:E9
  33. Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, et al. Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4:98–105
  34. Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, et al. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;17:E5
  35. Fong SY, DuPlessis SJ, Casha S, et al. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. Spine J. 2006;6:233–241
  36. Hacker RJ, Babcock R. Bone loss in patients treated with Bryan cervical arthroplasty: results of a randomized prospective study. Spine J. 2008;8:84s–85s
  37. Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, et al. Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc. Spine J. 2004;4(suppl 6):315S–321S
  38. Link HD, McAfee PC, Pimenta L. Choosing a cervical disc replacement. Spine J. 2004;4(suppl 6):294S–302S
  39. Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine. 2006;31:2802–2806
  40. Bertagnoli R, Duggal N, Pickett GE, et al. Cervical total disc replacement (Part 2: clinical results). Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36:355–362
  41. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter FDA investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 2009;9:275–286
  42. Shim CS, Shin HD, Lee SH. Posterior avulsion fracture at adjacent vertebral body during cervical disc replacement with ProDisc-C: a case report. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:468–472
  43. McAfee PC. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J. 2004;4(suppl 6):177S–181S
  44. Durbhakula MM, Ghiselli G. Cervical total disc replacement (Part 1: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types). Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36:349–354
  45. Traynelis VC, Haid RW. Spinal disc replacement: the development of artificial discs. SpineUniverse. http://www.spineuniverse.com/displayarticle.php/article1245.htmlAccessed October 10, 2008
  46. Pimenta L: Cervical facet degeneration after total disc replacement 272 levels in 158 patients: 5 years follow up. Presented at Cervical Spine Research Society 36th Annual Meeting, 2008, Austin, TX
  47. In:  Yue JJ,  McAfee PC,  An HS editor. Motion Preservation Surgery of the Spine: Advanced Techniques and Controversies. Amsterdam, NY: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008;p. 816
  48. Taksali S, Grauer JN, Vaccaro AR. Material considerations for intervertebral disc replacement implants. Spine J. 2004;4(suppl 6):231S–238S
  49. DeVine JG: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of adjacent segments after cervical disc arthroplasty: magnetic strength and Tis effect on image quality. Presented at Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2008, Austin, TX, pp 119-120
  50. Taunton MJ, McIntosh AL, Sperling JW, et al. Total shoulder arthroplasty with a metal-backed, bone-ingrowth glenoid component (Medium to long-term results). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2180–2188
  51. Madey SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, et al. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing (The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:53–64
  52. Illgen R, Rubash HE. The optimal fixation of the cementless acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:43–56
  53. Kienapfel H, Sprey C, Wilke A, et al. Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:355–368

PII: S1040-7383(09)00047-1

doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2009.05.007

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 3 , Pages 185-193 , September 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution