Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 93-101 , June 2008

Clinical and Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain

  • Keith M. Rinkus, MD
    • ,
  • Mark A. Knaub, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Mark A. Knaub, MD, Director, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Assistant Professor of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033.

References 

  1. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Thomas S. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BMJ. 2006;332(7555):1430–1434
  2. Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. Physician office visits for low back pain (Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey). Spine. 1995;20(1):11–19
  3. Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Low back pain investigations and prognosis: a review. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(6):494–498
  4. Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Maher CG, et al. Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ. 2003;327(7410):323
  5. Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain?. JAMA. 1992;268(6):760–765
  6. Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, et al. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. 1980;5(2):117–125
  7. Miller P, Kendrick D, Bentley E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar spine radiography in primary care patients with low back pain. Spine. 2002;27(20):2291–2297
  8. Espeland A, Baerheim A, Albrektsen G, et al. Patients' views on importance and usefulness of plain radiography for low back pain. Spine. 2001;26(12):1356–1363
  9. Collier BD, Johnson RP, Carrera GF, et al. Painful spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis studied by radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography. Radiology. 1985;154(1):207–211
  10. Kent DL, Larson EB. Disease, level of impact, and quality of research methods (Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging). Invest Radiol. 1992;27(3):245–254
  11. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects (A prospective investigation). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(3):403–408
  12. Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V, et al. 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences (The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations). Spine. 1995;20(24):2613–2625
  13. Jarvik JJ, Hollingworth W, Heagerty P, et al. The Longitudinal Assessment of Imaging and Disability of the Back (LAIDBack) Study: baseline data. Spine. 2001;26(10):1158–1166
  14. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, et al. MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology. 1998;209(3):661–666
  15. Hirsch C. An attempt to diagnose the level of a disc lesion clinically by disc puncture. Acta Orthop Scand. 1948;18:132–140
  16. Lindblom K. Diagnostic puncture of intervertebral disks in sciatica. Acta Orthop Scand. 1948;17:213–239
  17. Holt EP. The question of lumbar discography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968;50(4):720–726
  18. Walsh TR, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, et al. Lumbar discography in normal subjects (A controlled, prospective study). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(7):1081–1088
  19. Bernard TN. Lumbar discography followed by computed tomography (Refining the diagnosis of low-back pain). Spine. 1990;15(7):690–707
  20. Derby R, Howard MW, Grant JM, et al. The ability of pressure-controlled discography to predict surgical and nonsurgical outcomes. Spine. 1999;24(4):364–371discussion 371-372
  21. O'Neill C, Kurgansky M. Subgroups of positive discs on discography. Spine. 2004;29(19):2134–2139
  22. Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD. Lumbar discography (Position statement from the North American Spine Society Diagnostic and Therapeutic Committee). Spine. 1995;20(18):2048–2059
  23. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Khurana S, et al. The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms. Spine. 2000;25(11):1373–1380discussion 1381
  24. Block AR, Varharanta H, Ohnmeiss DD, et al. Discographic pain report (Influence of psychological factors). Spine. 1996;21(3):334–338
  25. Ohnmeiss DD, Vanharanta H, Guyer RD. The association between pain drawings and computed tomographic/discographic pain responses. Spine. 1995;20(6):729–733
  26. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Vittum D, et al: Positive provocative discography as a misleading finding in the evaluation of low back pain. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society, New York, New York, October 22-25, 1997
  27. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Yang B, et al. False-positive findings on lumbar discography (Reliability of subjective concordance assessment during provocative disc injection). Spine. 1999;24(23):2542–2547
  28. Carragee EJ, Alamin TF, Miller J, et al. Provocative discography in volunteer subjects with mild persistent low back pain. Spine J. 2002;2(1):25–34
  29. Heggeness MH, Watters WC, Gray PM. Discography of lumbar discs after surgical treatment for disc herniation. Spine. 1997;22(14):1606–1609
  30. Carragee EJ, Chen Y, Tanner CM, et al. Provocative discography in patients after limited lumbar discectomy: a controlled, randomized study of pain response in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Spine. 2000;25(23):3065–3071
  31. Carragee EJ, Lincoln T, Parmar VS, et al. A gold standard evaluation of the “discogenic pain” diagnosis as determined by provocative discography. Spine. 2006;31(18):2115–2123

PII: S1040-7383(08)00018-X

doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2008.02.004

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 93-101 , June 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution