Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 46-52 , March 2008

Revision of Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Other Anterior Instrumentation

  • Nader M. Hebela, MD

      Affiliations

    • St. Joseph Medical Center, Towson Orthopaedic Associates, Towson, MD.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Nader M. Hebela, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2 Silverstein Pavilion, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
    • ,
  • Samer Saiedy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vascular Surgery Division, St. Joseph Medical Center, Towson, MD.
    • ,
  • P. Justin Tortolani, MD

      Affiliations

    • St. Joseph Medical Center, Towson Orthopaedic Associates, Towson, MD.
    • ,
  • Paul C. McAfee, MD

      Affiliations

    • St. Joseph Medical Center, Towson Orthopaedic Associates, Towson, MD.

References 

  1. Kuslich SD, Danielson G, Dowdle JD, et al. Four-year follow-up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis using the Bagby and Kuslich lumbar fusion cage. Spine. 2000;25:2656–2662
  2. Ray CD. Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions. Spine. 1997;22:667–679discussion 679-680
  3. Button G, Gupta M, Barrett C, et al. Three- to six-year follow-up of stand-alone BAK cages implanted by a single surgeon. Spine J. 2005;5:155–160
  4. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Lee GA, et al. Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages. Spine. 1999;24:2147–2153
  5. Nguyen HV, Akbarnia BA, van Dam BE, et al. Anterior exposure of the spine for removal of lumbar interbody devices and implants. Spine. 2006;31:2449–2453
  6. Etminan M, Girardi FP, Khan SN, et al. Revision strategies for lumbar pseudarthrosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:381–392
  7. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:1938–1944
  8. van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:369–383
  9. Scott-Young M. Strategy for revision disc replacement surgery (Roundtables in spine surgery: complications and revision strategies in lumbar spine). Arthroplasty. 2005;1:23–71
  10. McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Saiedy SS, et al. Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE Artificial Disc. Spine. 2006;31:1217–1226
  11. Carragee EJ, Lincoln T, Parmar VS, et al. A gold standard evaluation of the “discogenic pain” diagnosis as determined by provocative discography. Spine. 2006;31:2115–2123
  12. Kurtz SM, van Ooij A, Ross R, et al. Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty. Spine J. 2007;7:12–21
  13. Kurtz SM, Peloza J, Siskey R, et al. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Spine J. 2005;5:344–350
  14. van Ooij A, Kurtz SM, Stessels F, et al. Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charite disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients. Spine. 2007;32:223–229
  15. Shim CS, Lee S, Maeng DH, et al. Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:465–469
  16. Brau SA, Delamarter RB, Schiffman ML, et al. Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery. Spine J. 2004;4:409–412
  17. Huang RC, Lim MR, Girardi FP, et al. The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients. Spine. 2004;29:2538–2541
  18. Pimenta L, Diaz RC, Guerrero LG. Charite lumbar artificial disc retrieval: use of a lateral minimally invasive technique (Technical note). J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5:556–561

PII: S1040-7383(07)00131-1

doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2007.11.007

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 46-52 , March 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution