Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 34-45 , March 2008

Revision Strategies Involving Lumbar Artificial Disc Replacement

  • Pablo R. Pazmiño, MD

      Affiliations

    • Beverly Spine Institute, Beverly Hills, CA.
    • Century City Doctors Hospital, Los Angeles, CA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Pablo R. Pazmiño, MD, Beverly Spine Institute, 8670 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 202, Beverly Hills, CA 90211.
    • ,
  • John J. Regan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Century City Doctors Hospital, Los Angeles, CA.
    • Pacific Coast Spine Institute, Beverly Hills, CA.

References 

  1. Regan JJ. Clinical results of Charite lumbar total disc replacement. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36:323–340
  2. Wagner W, Regan JJ, Leary SP, et al. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charite lumbar artificial disc replacement. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1266–1272
  3. Fuller TF, Kang SM, Hirose R, et al. Management of lymphoceles after renal transplantation: laparoscopic versus open drainage. J Urol. 2003;169:2022–2025
  4. Gayer G, Caspi I, Garniek A, et al. Perirectal urinoma from ureteral injury incurred during spinal surgery mimicking rectal perforation on computed tomography scan. Spine. 2002;27:E451–E453
  5. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Sexual function in men and women after anterior surgery for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:677–682
  6. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE[TM] artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: Part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1565–1575
  7. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K, et al. A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis (The initial European experience). Spine. 1994;19:1842–1849
  8. David T, Lemaire J-P, Moreno P. Lumbar disc prosthesis: an analysis of longterm complications for 272 SB Charite disc prostheses with minimum 10-year follow up. Spine J. 2004;4:S50–S51
  9. Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, et al. Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004 J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1:143–154
  10. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE [TM] artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: Part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1576–1583
  11. Aunoble S, Donkersloot P, Le Huec JC. Dislocations with intervertebral disc prosthesis: two case reports. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:464–467
  12. David T. Revision of a Charite artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charite artificial disc: case report and explant analysis. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:507–511
  13. Kurtz SM, Peloza J, Siskey R, et al. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Spine J. 2005;5:344–350
  14. Stieber JR, Donald GD. Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Techn. 2006;19:55–60
  15. McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Saiedy S, et al. Revisability of the Charite artificial disc replacement (Analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the Charite artificial disc). Spine. 2006;31:1217–1226
  16. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al. SB Charite disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:424–433
  17. Lemaire JP. SB Charite III intervertebral disc prosthesis: biomechanical, clinical, and radiological correlations with a series of 100 cases over a follow-up of more than 10 years. Rachis [The Spinal Column]. 2002;14:271–285
  18. Lemaire J-P, Carrier H, Sari Ali E-H, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite intervertebral disc prosthesis—minimum 10-year follow up. Spine J. 2004;4:S50
  19. Scott-Young M. Revision strategies for total lumbar disc replacement. Spine J. 2004;4:S115
  20. Sasso RC, Kenneth Burkus J, LeHuec JC. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine. 2003;28:1023–1026
  21. Geisler FH. Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:46–57
  22. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al. Experimental design of total disk replacement—experience with a prospective randomized study of the SB Charite. Spine. 2003;28:S153–S162

 No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

PII: S1040-7383(07)00130-X

doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2007.11.006

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 34-45 , March 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution