Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 34-45, March 2008

Revision Strategies Involving Lumbar Artificial Disc Replacement

  • Pablo R. Pazmiño, MD

      Affiliations

    • Beverly Spine Institute, Beverly Hills, CA.
    • Century City Doctors Hospital, Los Angeles, CA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Pablo R. Pazmiño, MD, Beverly Spine Institute, 8670 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 202, Beverly Hills, CA 90211.
  • ,
  • John J. Regan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Century City Doctors Hospital, Los Angeles, CA.
    • Pacific Coast Spine Institute, Beverly Hills, CA.

Lumbar disc arthroplasty can be an effective treatment for the properly selected patient with recalcitrant pain from isolated degenerative disc disease when all conservative modalities have been exhausted. Artificial disc replacement represents an ongoing effort to preserve segmental spinal motion, thereby avoiding excessive adjacent level stresses which may lead to accelerated degeneration. In the absence of facet arthropathy, results are optimized when a well-engineered implant is used, soft tissues are balanced, and the prosthesis is well positioned in appropriate alignment. Although current lumbar arthroplasty designs have resulted in a relatively low incidence of failure, there are various complications which may still occur. We describe our revision arthroplasty experience based on 20 cases performed over a 4-year period. This summarizes our approach, guidelines, and philosophies toward addressing a range of complications associated with lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Keywords: lumbar, arthroplasty, revision, disc replacement, CHARITÉ, ProDisc

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

PII: S1040-7383(07)00130-X

doi:10.1053/j.semss.2007.11.006

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 34-45, March 2008