Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 250-255, December 2007

Management of Cervical Facet Dislocations

  • Sumeet Vadera, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • John Ratliff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to John Ratliff, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, 909 Walnut 2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
  • ,
  • Zoe Brown, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • Archit Patel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • James S. Harrop, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • Ashwini Sharan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • Alexander R. Vaccaro, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Optimal management of unilateral and bilateral cervical facet fractures remains controversial. This article explores the evaluation and treatment options available, focusing on the controversy surrounding prereduction magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the choice of surgical approach. In addition, the authors propose a treatment protocol for cervical facet dislocations. Acute disk herniation and disruption is highly prevalent in traumatic cervical facet injury. Some authors maintain the necessity of prereduction MRI to identify those at risk for further prolapse of a herniated disk during closed reduction maneuvers. Others maintain the risk of neurologic deterioration is small in the appropriate patient. To date, no permanent neurological worsening has ever been documented following a closed cervical spine reduction in an awake, cooperative patient. The need for open internal fixation following reduction is widely accepted; however, surgical treatment options are diverse and include anterior, posterior, and combined approaches. Closed reduction of cervical facet dislocations without baseline MRI is appropriate in the awake, cooperative patient. Postreduction MRI is essential in identifying herniated disks and tailoring a surgical approach. An anterior approach is classically employed with a concurrent disk herniation, although a combined anterior and posterior approach is sometimes chosen due to the severity of ligamentous disruption associated with bilateral cervical facet dislocations.

Keywords: cervical spine, spinal cord injury, unilateral facet dislocation, bilateral facet dislocation, MRI

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1040-7383(07)00106-2

doi:10.1053/j.semss.2007.09.006

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 250-255, December 2007