Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 200-205 , September 2007

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

  • Eric Francke, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Eric Francke, MD, Spine Surgery Fellow, William Beaumont Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 3535 West Thirteen Mile Road, #744, Royal Oak, MI 48073.
  • ,
  • Chetan Patel, MD

References 

  1. De Villiers PD, Booyson EL. Fibrous spinal stenosis: a report of 850 myelograms with a water-soluble contrast medium. Clin Orthop. 1976;115:140–144
  2. Spivak JM. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current concepts review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1053–1066
  3. Arbit E, Panullo S. Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review. Clinic Orthop Rel Res. 2001;384:137–143
  4. Aryanpur J, Ducker T. Multilevel lumbar laminotomies: and alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 1990;26:429–433
  5. Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D, et al. The surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis: multiple laminotomy compated with total laminectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:386–392
  6. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG, et al. The outcomes of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:809–816
  7. Herron LD, Mangelsdorf C. Lumbar spinal stenosis: results of surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4:26–33
  8. Hasue M, Kida H, Inoue K, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: a clinical study of symptoms and therapeutic results. Int Orthop. 1977;1:133–137
  9. Getty CM. Lumbar spinal stenosis: the clinical spectrum and the results of operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62:481–485
  10. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:802–808
  11. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized, study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1997;22:2807–2812
  12. Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudoarthrosis. Spine. 2004;29(7):726–733
  13. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery (A histological and enzymatic analysis). Spine. 1996;21:941–944
  14. Gejo R, Matsui H, Tsuji J. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery (Part 2. Histologic and hisochemical analysis in humans). Spine. 1994;19:2598–2602
  15. Sihoven T, Herno A, Palijiarvi L. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine. 1993;18:575–581
  16. Styf JR, Willen J. The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 1998;23:354–358
  17. Foley KT, Langston TH, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine. 2003;28:S26–S35
  18. Kambin P, Gellman H. Percutaneous lateral discectomy for the lumbar spine: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop. 1983;174:127–132
  19. Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, Fessler RG. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(suppl 2):200–210
  20. Foley KT, Smith MM. Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg. 1997;3:301–307
  21. Khoo LT, Beisse R, Potulski M. Thoracoscopic-assisted treatment of thoracic and lumbar fractures: a series of 371 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(suppl 2):105–117
  22. Mack MJ, Regan JJ, Bobechko WP, et al. Application of thoracoscopy for diseases of the spine. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:736–738
  23. Kim DH, Jaikumar S, Kam AC. Minimally invasive spine instrumentation. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:15–25
  24. Tullberg T, Isacson J, Weidenhielm L. Does microscopic removal of lumbar disc herniation lead to better results than the standard procedure? (Results of a one year randomized study). Spine. 1993;18:24–27
  25. Hanley EN, Shapiro DE. The development of low back pain after the excision of a lumbar disc. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:719–721
  26. Williams RW. Microlumbar discectomy (A 12-year statistical review). Spine. 1986;11:851–852
  27. Brayda-Bruno M. Lumbar posterior endoscopic microdiscectomy: indications, techniques, and midterm results of the first 100 consecutive patients. In:  Gunzburg R,  Szpalski M editor. Lumbar disc herniation. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002;p. 201–206
  28. Barrios C, Ahmed M, Arrotegui J, et al. Microsurgery versus standard removal of the herniated lumbar disc (A 3-year comparison in 150 cases). Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;61:399–403
  29. Hanley E, Delamarter R, McColluch J, et al. Surgical indications and techniques. In:  Wiesel SW,  Weinstein J,  Herkowitz H, et al. editor. The lumbar spine: the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine. (ed 2). Philadelphia, PA: WB Sanders; 1996;p. 492–524
  30. McColloch JA. Focus issue on lumbar disc herniation: macro- and microdiscectomy. Spine. 1996;21(suppl 24):45s–56s
  31. Maroon JC. Current concepts in minimally invasive discectomy. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(suppl 24):137–145
  32. Hilton DL. Microdiscectomy with a minimally invasive tubular retractor. In:  Perez-Creut MJ,  Fessler RG editor. Outpatient spinal surgery. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing Inc; 2002;p. 159–170
  33. Foley KT, Smith MM, Rampersaud YR. Microendoscopic discectomy. In:  Schmidek JJ editors. Operative neurosurgical techniques: indications, methods and results. (ed 4). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2000;
  34. Schlick U, Dohnert J. Technique of microendoscopy in medial lumbar disc herniations. Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2002;45:139–141
  35. Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G. A new full-endoscopic technique for the interlaminar operation of lumbar disc herniations using 6 mm endoscopes: prospective 2 year results of 331 patients. Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2006;49:80–87
  36. Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG. A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine. 2002;27:432–438
  37. Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T, et al. Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:624–633
  38. Cipri S, Cafarelli F, Itleo A, et al. Microsurgical approach to lumbar synovial cysts. J Neurosurg Sci. 2004;48:29–36
  39. Foley KT, Gupta SK. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:7–12
  40. Moskovitz PA. Minimally invasive posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:665–667
  41. Phillips FM, Cunningham B. Intertransverse lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2002;27(2):E37–E41
  42. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine. 2003;28:S26–S35
  43. Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA. Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 2002;49:499–517
  44. Sidhu KS, Herkowitz HN. Spinal instrumentation in the management of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop. 1997;335:39–53
  45. Brodke DS, Dick JC, Kunz DN. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage. Spine. 1997;22:26–31
  46. Matthews HH, Long BH. Endoscopy assisted percutaneous anterior interbody fusion with subcutaneous suprafascial internal fixation: evolution of technique and surgical considerations. Orthop Int Ed. 1995;3:496–500
  47. Lowery GI, Kulkami SS. Posterior percutaneous spine instrumentation. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(suppl 1):216–230
  48. Jang J, Lee S. Minimally invasive transforamenal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3:218–223
  49. Guyer RD, Foley KT, Phillips FM, et al. Minimally invasive fusion. Spine. 2003;28:544

PII: S1040-7383(07)00059-7

doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2007.06.009

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 200-205 , September 2007