Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 150-164 , September 2007

Revision Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis: Techniques, Results, and Complications

  • Christopher M. Bono, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Christopher M. Bono, MD, Chief, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.
  • ,
  • Gregory W. Brick, FRACS

References 

  1. Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Fiedlman Z, et al. Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:32–37
  2. Hansrai KK, O’Leary PF, Cammisa FP, et al. Decompression, fusion, and instrumentation surgery for complex lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:18–25
  3. Johsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, et al. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar stenosis (Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer). Spine. 1997;22:2938–2944
  4. Caputy AJ, Luessenhop AJ. Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Neurosurg. 1992;77:669–676
  5. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, et al. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine. 2005;30:936–943
  6. Jansson KA, Nemeth G, Granath F, et al. Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years—a national analysis of 9,664 operations. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:659–663
  7. Javid MJ, Hadar EJ. Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:1–7
  8. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, et al. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:92–98
  9. Kirkaldy-Willis WH. The relationship of structural pathology to the nerve root. Spine. 1984;9:49–52
  10. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Paine KW, Cauchoix J, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;99:30–50
  11. McIvor GW, Kirkaldy-Willis WH. Pathological and myelographic changes in the major types of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;115:72–76
  12. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:1938–1944
  13. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine. 1988;13:375–377
  14. Gomez del Riva A, Isla A, Perez-Lopez C, et al. [Causes of reoperations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with instrumentations]. sNeurocirugia (Astur). 2006;17:232–239
  15. Jenis LG, An HS, Gordin R. Foraminal stenosis of the lumbar spine: a review of 65 surgical cases. Am J Orthop. 2001;30:205–211
  16. Hadjipavlou A, Enker P, Dupuis P, et al. The causes of failure of lumbar transpedicular spinal instrumentation and fusion: a prospective study. Int Orthop. 1996;20:35–42
  17. Van Goethem JW, Parizel PM, Van den Hauwe L, et al. Imaging finding in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. J Belge Radiol. 1997;80:81–84
  18. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis (A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:802–808
  19. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V. Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation (A selected survey of ABS members). Spine. 1993;18:2231–2238
  20. Schwarzenbch O, Berlemann U, Jost B, et al. Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement (An in vivo computed tomography analysis). Spine. 1997;22:452–458
  21. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Robert Kolen E, Jun P, et al. Accuracy over space and time of computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation in the lumbar spine in vivo. J Spinal Disord Techn. 2006;19:109–113
  22. Soyuncu Y, Tildirim FB, Sekban H, et al. Anatomic evaluation and relationship between the lumbar pedicle and adjacent neural structures: an anatomic study. J Spinal Disord Techn. 2005;18:243–246
  23. Donovan DJ, Polly DW, Ondra SL. The removal of a transdural pedicle screw placed for thoracolumbar spine fracture. Spine. 1996;21:2495–2498
  24. Bono CM, Alapatt M, Simmons C, et al. Fusion method or pedicle screws: risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration?. San Diego, CA: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2007;
  25. Booth KC, Bridwell K, Eisenberg BA, et al. Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine. 1999;24:1721–1727
  26. Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?. Spine J. 2004;4:190S–194S
  27. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1497–1503
  28. Kleeman TJ, Hiscoe AC, Berg EE. Patient outcomes after minimally destabilizing lumbar stenosis decompression: the “Port-Hole” technique. Spine. 2000;25:865–870
  29. Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine. 1990;15:1142–1147
  30. Guigui P, Ulivieri JM, Lassale B, et al. [Reoperations after surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1995;81:663–671
  31. Sheehan JP, Helm GA, Sheehan JM, et al. Stress fracture of the pedicle after extensive decompression and contralateral posterior fusion for lumbar stenosis (Report of three cases). Neurosurg Focus. 2002;13:E9
  32. Hsu CJ, Chou WY, Chang WN, et al. Clinical follow up after instrumentation-augmented lumbar spinal surgery in patients with unsatisfactory outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5:281–286
  33. Bono CM, Lee CK. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine. 2004;29:455–463
  34. Grauer JN, Vaccaro AR, Kato M, et al. Development of a New Zealand white rabbit model of spinal pseudarthrosis repair and evaluation of the potential role of OP-1 to overcome pseudarthrosis. Spine. 2004;29:1405–1412
  35. France JC, Norman TL, Santrock RD, et al. The efficacy of direct current stimulation for lumbar intertransverse process fusions in an animal model. Spine. 2001;26:1002–1008
  36. Jenis LG, An HS, Stein R, et al. Prospective comparison of the effect of direct current electrical stimulation and pulsed electromagnetic fields on instrumented posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:290–296
  37. Phillips FM, Cunningham B. Managing chronic pain of spinal origina after lumbar surgery: the role of decompressive surgery. Spine. 2002;27:2547–2553
  38. Zheng F, Cammisa FP, Sandhu HS, et al. Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Spine. 2002;27:818–824
  39. Chen WJ, Lai PL, Niu CC, et al. Surgical treatment of adjacent instability after lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2001;26:E519–E524
  40. Jonsson B, Stromqvist B. Repeat decompression of lumbar nerve roots (A prospective two-year evaluation). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:894–897
  41. Heller JG, Ghanayem AJ, McAfee P, et al. Iatrogenic lumbar spondylolisthesis: treatment by anterior fibular and iliac arthrodesis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:309–318
  42. Tafaza SI, Sell PJ. Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: incidence and management. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:287–290
  43. Wang JC, Bohlman HH, Riew KD. Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine (Management and results after a two-year minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1728–1732
  44. Shin AY, Dekutoski MB. The role of vascularized bone grafts in spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:61–72
  45. Kim CW, Abrams R, Lee G, et al. Use of vascularized fibular grafts as a salvage procedure for previously failed spinal arthrodesis. Spine. 2001;26:2171–2175
  46. Nakamura H, Yamano Y, Seki M, et al. Use of folded vascularized rib graft in anterior fusion after treatment of thoracic and upper lumbar lesions (Technical note). J Neurosurg. 2001;94:323–327
  47. Kuo CH, Wang ST, Yu WK, et al. Postoperative spinal deep wound infection: a six-year review of 3230 selective procedures. J Chin Med Assoc. 2004;67:398–402
  48. Mehbod AA, Ogilvie JW, Pinto MR, et al. Postoperative deep wound infections in adults after spinal fusion: management with vacuum-assisted wound closure. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:14–17

PII: S1040-7383(07)00054-8

doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2007.06.004

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 3 , Pages 150-164 , September 2007