Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 98-105, June 2007

Imaging Update on Cervical Spinal Trauma, Instability Screening, and Clearance

  • Andrew P. White, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Andrew P. White, MD, 834 Chestnut Street, Apt. 1114, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
  • ,
  • Stewart Kerr, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • Richard C. Mendel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ.
  • ,
  • David Hannallah, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • Alexander R. Vaccaro, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Jefferson Medical College and the Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.

Clinicians from varied specialties rely on cervical spine imaging techniques. The assessment of cervical spine instability after trauma is one typical scenario where imaging is a critical part of the evaluation. Screening for instability in nontraumatic clinical scenarios is also germane, however. Protocols to guide the clinician as to what imaging study is most useful to assess each patient circumstance have been refined in the past decade. This development has been driven, in part, by an evolution in modern imaging techniques. Changes in guidelines have also been motivated by the outcomes of large prospective series evaluating screening techniques. While various guidelines have been proposed by clinicians with varied perspectives and specialties, the recommendations are converging and have become remarkably similar to one another. As such, practical protocols for evaluating cervical spinal trauma, instability, and clearance can be proposed with expectation for wide applicability and good predictability.

Keywords: cervical imaging, trauma clearance, instability evaluation, screening utility of flexion–extension radiographs, cervical screening guidelines

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1040-7383(07)00035-4

doi:10.1053/j.semss.2007.04.004

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 98-105, June 2007