Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 72-77 , June 2007

The Role of Discography in the Evaluation of Degenerative Disc Disease

  • Richard D. Guyer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Richard D. Guyer, MD, 6020 W. Parker Road, #200, Plano, TX 75093.
    • ,
  • Donna D. Ohnmeiss, DrMed

      Affiliations

    • Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX.

References 

  1. Adams MA, Roughley PJ. What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it?. Spine. 2006;31:2151–2161
  2. Ohnmeiss DD. Pain drawings in the evaluation of lumbar disc-related pain. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institute; 2000;
  3. Peng B, Wu W, Li Z, et al. Chemical radiculitis. Pain: e-pub prior to printed version. 2006;
  4. Milette PC, Fontaine S, Lepanto L, et al. Radiating pain to the lower extremities caused by lumbar disk rupture without spinal nerve root involvement. AJNR. 1995;16:1605–1613
  5. Ohnmeiss DD, Vanharanta H, Ekholm J. Relation between pain location and disc pathology: a study of pain drawings and CT/discography. Clin J Pain. 1999;15:210–217
  6. O’Neill CW, Kurgansky ME, Derby R, et al. Disc stimulation and patterns of referred pain. Spine. 2002;27:2776–2781
  7. Peng B, Wu W, Hou S, et al. The pathogenesis of discogenic low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:62–67
  8. Freemont AJ, Watkins A, Le Maitre C, et al. Nerve growth factor expression and innervation of the painful intervertebral disc. J Pathol. 2002;197:286–292
  9. Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Kirking BC, et al. Posterior annular strains during discography. J Spinal Disorder. 2001;14:347–352
  10. O’Neill C, Kurgansky M. Subgroups of positive discs on discography. Spine. 2004;29:2134–2139
  11. Lee SH, Derby R, Chen Y, et al. In vitro measurement of pressure in intervertebral discs and annulus fibrosus with and without annular tears during discography. Spine J. 2004;4:614–618
  12. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects (A prospective investigation). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:403–408
  13. Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V, et al. 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences (The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations). Spine. 1995;20:2613–2625
  14. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Khurana S, et al. The rates of false-positive lumbar discography in select patients without low back symptoms. Spine. 2000;25:1373–1380
  15. Carragee EJ, Alamin TF, Carragee JM. Low-pressure positive discography in subjects asymptomatic of significant low back pain illness. Spine. 2006;31:505–509
  16. Carragee EJ, Chen Y, Tanner CM, et al. Can discography cause long-term back symptoms in previously asymptomatic subjects. Spine. 2000;25:1803–1808
  17. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, et al. Provocative discography in low back pain patients with or without somatization disorder: a randomized prospective evaluation. Pain Physician. 2001;4:227–239
  18. Derby R, Lee SH, Kim BJ, et al. Pressure-controlled lumbar discography in volunteers without low back symptoms. Pain Med. 2005;6:213–221
  19. Aprill C, Bogduk N. High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 1992;65:361–369
  20. Peng B, Hou S, Wu W, et al. The pathogenesis and clinical significance of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) of lumbar intervertebral disc on MR imaging in the patient with discogenic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:583–587
  21. Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S. 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine. 2000;25:2987–2992
  22. Lam KS, Carlin D, Mulholland RC. Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:36–41
  23. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, et al. Painful lumbar disk derangement: relevance of endplate abnormalities at MR imaging. Radiology. 2001;218:420–427
  24. Lim CH, Jee WH, Son BC, et al. Discogenic lumbar pain: association with MR imaging and CT discography. Eur J Radiol. 2005;54:431–437
  25. Braithwaite I, White J, Saifuddin A, et al. Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI: correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:363–368
  26. Sandhu HS, Sanchez-Caso LP, Parvataneni HK, et al. Association between findings of provocative discography and vertebral endplate signal changes as seen on MRI. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:438–443
  27. Yoshida H, Fujiwara A, Tamai K, et al. Diagnosis of symptomatic disc by magnetic resonance imaging: T2-weighted and gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15:193–198
  28. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, et al. The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1995;20:1878–1883
  29. Laslett M, Oberg B, Aprill CN, et al. Centralization as a predictor of provocation discography results in chronic low back pain, and the influence of disability and distress on diagnostic power. Spine J. 2005;5:370–380
  30. Carragee EJ, Lincoln T, Parmar VS, et al. A gold standard evaluation of the “discogenic pain” diagnosis as determined by provocative discography. Spine. 2006;31:2115–2123
  31. Madan S, Gundanna M, Harley JM, et al. Does provocative discography screening of discogenic back pain improve surgical outcome. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15:245–251
  32. Moore KR, Pinto MR, Butler LM. Degenerative disc disease treated with combined anterior and posterior arthrodesis and posterior instrumentation. Spine. 2002;27:1680–1686
  33. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: Part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1565–1575
  34. Zigler JE, Delamarter RB. Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trail comparing ProDisc to 360 Fusion. results from the FDA IDE Clinical Trial Spine Arthroplasty Society. 2006;Montreal, Canada
  35. Blumenthal SL, Geisler F, Guyer RD, et al. Spine Arthroplasty Society Similarities and differences in Clinical and radiographic outcomes of two US IDE trials for lumbar disc replacement. 2007;Berlin, Germany, May
  36. Slipman CW, Patel RK, Zhang L, et al. Side of symptomatic annular tear and site of low back pain: is there a correlation?. Spine. 2001;26:E165–E169
  37. Derby R, Kim BJ, Lee SH, et al. Comparison of discographic findings in asymptomatic subject discs and the negative discs of chronic LBP patients: can discography distinguish asymptomatic discs among morphologically abnormal discs?. Spine J. 2005;5:389–394
  38. Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD. Lumbar discography. Spine J. 2003;3:11S–27S

PII: S1040-7383(07)00033-0

doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2007.04.002

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 72-77 , June 2007

Article Tools