Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 47-50 , March 2007

Asymptomatic Cervical Stenosis: To Operate or Not?

References 

  1. Teresi LM, Lufkin RB, Reicher MA, et al. Asymptomatic degenerative disk disease and spondylosis of the cervical spine: MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;164(1):83–88
  2. Riew KD. Cervical Stenosis Debate. Philadelphia, PA: North American Spine Society; 2005;
  3. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Taketomi E, et al. Clinical course of patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a minimum 10-year cohort study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;100(suppl 3):245–248
  4. Bednarik J, Kadanka Z, Dusek L, et al. Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical cord compression. Spine. 2004;29(20):2260–2269
  5. Yu YL, Du Boulay GH, Stevens JM, et al. Computer-assisted myelography in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy (Clinical correlations and pathogenetic mechanisms). Brain. 1986;109(Pt. 2):259–278
  6. Kanchiku T, Taguchi T, Kaneko K, et al. A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological findings in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 2001;26(13):E294–E299
  7. Penning L, Wilmink JT, Van Woerden HH, et al. CT myelographic findings in degenerative disorders of the cervical spine: clinical significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146(4):793–801
  8. Wang MY, Shah S, Green BA. Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 204 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol. 2004;62(6):487–492discussion 492-493
  9. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, et al. Minimum 10-year follow-up after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:129–139
  10. Sekhon LH. Posterior cervical decompression and fusion for circumferential spondylotic cervical stenosis: review of 50 consecutive cases. J Clin Neurosci. 2006;13(1):23–30
  11. Satomi K, Ogawa J, Ishii Y, et al. Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine J. 2001;1(1):26–30
  12. Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD, et al. Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy (A prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review). Spine. 2000;25(6):670–676
  13. Ebersold MJ, Pare MC, Quast LM. Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1995;82(5):745–751
  14. Kohno K, Kumon Y, Oka Y, et al. Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol. 1997;48(3):237–245
  15. Chibbaro S, Benvenuti L, Carnesecchi S, et al. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: experience and surgical results in a series of 70 consecutive patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2006;13(2):233–238
  16. Kato Y, Iwasaki M, Fuji T, et al. Long-term follow-up results of laminectomy for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(2):217–223
  17. Ikenaga M, Shikata J, Tanaka C. Long-term results over 10 years of anterior corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Spine. 2006;31(14):1568–1574discussion 1575
  18. Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(2):168–174
  19. Vogt MT, Cawthon PM, Kang JD, et al. Prevalence of symptoms of cervical and lumbar stenosis among participants in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. Spine. 2006;31(13):1445–1451
  20. King JT, Moossy JJ, Tsevat J, et al. Multimodal assessment after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(5):526–534
  21. Epstein NE. Laminectomy for cervical myelopathy. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(6):317–327
  22. Rowland LP. Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: time for a controlled trial. Neurology. 1992;42(1):5–13
  23. Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednarik J, et al. Predictive factors for spondylotic cervical myelopathy treated conservatively or surgically. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12(1):55–63
  24. Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednarik J, et al. Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Spine. 2002;27(20):2205–2210discussion 2210-2211

PII: S1040-7383(07)00002-0

doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2007.01.001

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 47-50 , March 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution