Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 53-60 , June 2006

Cervical Disc Replacement: The State of the Data

  • Joseph D. Smucker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Joseph D. Smucker, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, The University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, 01017 JPP, Iowa City, IA 52242.
    • ,
  • Rick C. Sasso, MD

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana Spine Group, Indianapolis, IN.

References 

  1. Bohlman HH , Emery SE , Goodfellow DB , et al.   Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1993;75(9):1298–1307
  2. Hilibrand AS , Carlson GD , Palumbo MA , et al.   Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1999;81(4):519–528
  3. Goffin J , van LJ , Van CF , et al.   Long-term results after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine . J Spinal Disord . 1995;8(6):500–508 discussion 499
  4. Goffin J , Geusens E , Vantomme N , et al.   Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine . J Spinal Disord Techn . 2004;17(2):79–85
  5. Eck JC , Humphreys SC , Lim TH , et al.   Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion . Spine . 2002;27(22):2431–2434
  6. Fuller DA , Kirkpatrick JS , Emery SE , et al.   A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis . Spine . 1998;23(15):1649–1656
  7. Brodke DS , Zdeblick TA . Modified Smith-Robinson procedure for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion . Spine . 1992;17:S427–S430
  8. Bohlman HH , Emery SE , Goodfellow DB , et al.   Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1993;75:1298–1307
  9. Sandhu HS , Grewal HS , Parvataneni H . Bone grafting for spinal fusion . Orthop Clin North Am . 1999;30:685–698
  10. Brown CA , Eismont FJ . Complications in spinal fusion . Orthop Clin North Am . 1998;29:679–699
  11. Summers BN , Eisenstein SM . Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 1989;71:677–680
  12. Silber JS , Anderson DG , Daffner SD , et al.   Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion . Spine . 2003;28(2):134–139
  13. St John TA , Vaccaro AR , Sah AP , et al.   Physical and monetary costs associated with autogenous bone graft harvesting . Am J Orthop . 2003;32(1):18–23
  14. Cummins BH , Robertson JT , Gill SS . Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint . J Neurosurg . 1998;88:943–948
  15. Wigfield CC , Gill SS , Nelson RJ , et al.   The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint (results from a two-year pilot study) . Spine . 2002;27(22):2446–2452
  16. Wigfield C , Gill S , Nelson R , et al.   Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease . J Neurosurg Spine . 2002;96:17–21
  17. Porchet F , Metcalf NH . Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc (preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial) . Neurosurg Focus . 2004;17:E6
  18. Pimenta L , Leon M, McAfee PC, et al: Single versus multilevel cervical disc replacements. Two year follow up of the PCM discs. 2005 AANS Annual Meeting. 4-19-2005, New Orleans, Louisiana. [Abstract]
  19. Bertagnoli R , Duggal N , Pickett GE , et al.   Cervical total disc replacement, part two (clinical results) . Orthop Clin North Am . 2005;36(3):355–362
  20. Goffin J , Casey A , Kehr P , et al.   Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.[see comment] . Neurosurgery . 2002;51(3):840–845 discussion 845-847
  21. Goffin J , Van CF , van LJ , et al.   Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis (single-level and bi-level) . Spine . 2003;28(24):2673–2678
  22. Sekhon LH . Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy . J Spinal Disord Techn . 2003;16(4):307–313
  23. Duggal N , Pickett GE , Mitsis DK , et al.   Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty . Neurosurg Focus . 2004;17:E9
  24. Anderson PA , Sasso RC , Rouleau JP , et al.   The Bryan Cervical Disc (wear properties and early clinical results) . Spine J . 2004;4(suppl 6):303S–309S
  25. Anderson PA , Sasso RC , Rouleau JP , et al.   The Bryan Cervical Disc (wear properties and early clinical results) . Spine J . 2004;4(suppl 6):303S–309S
  26. Goodman SB , Huie P , Song Y , et al.   Cellular profile and cytokine production at prosthetic interfaces. Study of tissues retrieved from revised hip and knee replacements . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 1998;80(3):531–539
  27. Goodman SB , Lind M , Song Y , et al.   In vitro, in vivo, and tissue retrieval studies on particulate debris . Clin Orthopaed Relat Res . 1998;(352):25–34 [Review] [76 refs]
  28. Anderson PA , Rouleau JP , Bryan VE , et al.   Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis . Spine . 2003;28:S186–S194
  29. Gelb H , Schumacher HR , Cuckler J , et al.   In vivo inflammatory response to polymethylmethacrylate particulate debris (effect of size, morphology, and surface area) . J Orthopaed Res . 1994;12(1):83–92 erratum appears in J Orthop Res 1994 Jul;12(4):598
  30. Allen MJ , Myer BJ , Millett PJ , et al.   The effects of particulate cobalt, chromium and cobalt-chromium alloy on human osteoblast-like cells in vitro . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 1997;79:475–482
  31. Gonzalez O , Smith RL , Goodman SB . Effect of size, concentration, surface area, and volume of polymethylmethacrylate particles on human macrophages in vitro . J Biomed Mater Res . 1996;30(4):463–473
  32. Goodman SB , Fornasier VL , Kei J . The effects of bulk versus particulate ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene on bone . J Arthroplasty . 1988;3(suppl):S41–S46
  33. Anderson PA , Rouleau JP , Bryan VE , et al.   Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis . Spine . 2003;28:S186–S194
  34. Anderson PA , Sasso RC , Rouleau JP , et al.   The Bryan Cervical Disc (wear properties and early clinical results) . Spine J . 2004;4(suppl 6):303S–309S
  35. Anderson PA , Rouleau JP , Bryan VE , et al.   Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis . Spine . 2003;28:S186–S194
  36. Anderson PA , Sasso RC , Rouleau JP , et al.   The Bryan Cervical Disc (wear properties and early clinical results) . Spine J . 2004;4(suppl 6):303S–309S
  37. Anderson PA , Rouleau JP , Bryan VE , et al.   Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis . Spine . 2003;28:S186–S194
  38. Medtronic Sofamor Danek. Bryan Cervical Disc Image . Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc; 2004; Slide
  39. Cervitech Inc. Hands-on Lab Information Sheet. 11-7-2005. Rockaway, NJ, Cervitech Inc. [Pamphlet]

PII: S1040-7383(06)00023-2

doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2006.03.006

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 53-60 , June 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution