Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 47-52, June 2006

Patient Selection for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

  • Christopher R. Brown, MD
  • ,
  • John G. Heller, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to John G. Heller, MD, The Emory Spine Center, 59 Executive Park South, Suite 3000, Atlanta, Georgia 30329 USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Emory Spine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Cervical intervertebral disc replacement is a current area of much interest. The primary indication for surgery is to remove symptomatic spinal cord or nerve root compression. The intended purpose of the disc prosthesis is to maintain normal physiologic motion at the operated disc level. Anterior cervical disectomy and fusion has an excellent track record in treating radiculopathy and myelopathy. However there are some disadvantages to fusions. The premise of cervical arthroplasty is that by preserving motion it will reduce the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration while avoiding the postoperative restrictions and complications inherent in any fusion. The ideal candidate should have a single- or two-level disc herniation with minimal spondylosis causing symptoms and signs of radiculopathy or myelopathy that have failed nonoperative management. Axial neck pain should not be the chief complaint, and the posterior facets should be free of arthrosis. The bone must be of good quality to allow implant to bone fixation without settling. Cervical arthroplasty is contraindicated in the setting of deformity or instability.

Keywords:  disc replacement , arthroplasty , cervical , indications

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 10.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1040-7383(06)00022-0

doi:10.1053/j.semss.2006.03.005

Seminars in Spine Surgery
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 47-52, June 2006